home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=94TT0612>
- <title>
- May 16, 1994: Interview:Desire to Help Neighbors
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1994
- May 16, 1994 "There are no devils...":Rwanda
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- INTERVIEW, Page 65
- A Desire to Help Its Neighbors
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p> Nelson Mandela on South Africa's new role
- </p>
- <p>By Nelson Mandela, John Stacks, Scott MacLeod and Peter Hawthorne.
- </p>
- <p> The security around President-elect Nelson Mandela last week
- neatly captured the country's new mood: his African National
- Congress bodyguards mixed easily with his white, Afrikaans-speaking
- government agents, exchanging black-power handshakes and chatting
- amiably. Three days before his inauguration, Mandela talked
- in Cape Town with Time deputy managing editor John Stacks, Johannesburg
- bureau chief Scott MacLeod and correspondent Peter Hawthorne.
- </p>
- <p> TIME: U.N. Secretary-General Boutros Boutros-Ghali has called
- on African nations to supply a peacekeeping force for Rwanda.
- Will South Africa take part?
- </p>
- <p> Mandela: Our security forces are at present overstretched. But
- the fact that ((Zulu leader Mangosuthu)) Buthelezi is now participating
- ((in the government)) might make it unnecessary to have such
- large concentrations of security forces in Natal. Therefore
- we might have a unit available. There are many problems facing
- Africa, so I would be well disposed to assisting, provided I
- feel confident that the situation in this country is normal.
- </p>
- <p> TIME: What about aid for Africa?
- </p>
- <p> Mandela: This is something we would like to do. But at the same
- time we don't want to be assertive and remind Africa of the
- days of apartheid. We would like to do things on a basis of
- equality with other African states and consult them on what
- role we should play. Leave it to them to say, "Look, we want
- you to play this role on this particular issue." We have a problem
- in that we have to improve our image as projected during the
- days of apartheid. We have to be very, very careful not to create
- the impression that we want to dominate ((other African countries))
- economically.
- </p>
- <p> TIME: You say you are satisfied that your party got 63% of the
- vote, though two-thirds would have enabled you to write a new
- constitution without support from F.W. de Klerk's party, which
- came in second with 20%. We've never heard a politician say
- he was glad he didn't get even more votes. Can you explain?
- </p>
- <p> Mandela: Mr. De Klerk was the first to telephone me to express
- his concern about the fact that we were on the verge of reaching
- a ((two-thirds)) majority. Mr. De Klerk was very much concerned.
- I didn't want him to be concerned. Therefore to have a two-thirds
- majority, which would have enabled us to do what we like, would
- have raised tensions in a situation where there should be normality,
- where people should be sure they are not just going to be used
- as rubber stamps. That is why I was relieved.
- </p>
- <p> TIME: How will history judge De Klerk?
- </p>
- <p> Mandela: Mr. De Klerk had the courage to come out openly and
- say, "Apartheid has failed. The best way is negotiations." We
- must compliment him for that. But in spite of the fact that
- he made this commendable contribution, it was a foregone conclusion
- that his party was going to disappear. After the next five years,
- I don't think anybody will ever hear of the National Party.
- He applied dirty-trick tactics in this campaign. Very dirty,
- racist tactics. Nevertheless we beat them. But Mr. De Klerk
- has made a contribution. Without him, we could not have made
- this progress. It would have been a series of conflicts and
- turmoil that would have further destroyed our economy. By his
- cooperation we avoided that catastrophe.
- </p>
- <p> TIME: Are you worried about the stability of South Africa?
- </p>
- <p> Mandela: I don't regard the future with any pessimism. I have
- been having discussions with the full general staff of the South
- African Defense Force. I have had discussions with all the police
- generals who are responsible for policy. Three days ago I met
- ((right-wing leader)) General Constand Viljoen and had very
- fruitful discussions with him. We made a plan as to how to deal
- with the demands of the Afrikaners. ((Viljoen, whose party won
- 2% of the vote, is seeking an Afrikaner state.)) The entry of
- Buthelezi into the elections and now the fact that he is going
- to serve in the government of national unity will actually reduce
- violence in Natal, and perhaps it will disappear altogether.
- As far as the question of the Third Force ((of right-wing security-force
- elements allegedly subverting democracy)) is concerned, we have
- taken over the army as well as the police. Mr. De Klerk tried
- to say, "If you take defense, give us the police. Or if you
- take the police, give us defense." I said, "No. Those two must
- be controlled by us. You are not in a position to clean the
- police force of the elements that are creating this violence.
- On the contrary, you are trying to defend the commission of
- activities by this Third Force that is in the security forces.
- We are the only people who can make sure that this question
- of the Third Force is dealt with."
- </p>
- <p> TIME: How is your health?
- </p>
- <p> Mandela: My health is good. Of course the strain has been very
- great. One of these days I am going to take a gun and go and
- shoot, but don't tell the environmentalists. One time I shot
- a kudu bull. By the time I returned from the game reserve and
- landed at the airport, there was a demonstration. "You are a
- murderer! You are a murderer!" I am going to go to the bush
- and rest a bit.
- </p>
-
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-
-